Watching Conformly audit Medra Health

Medra Health is a telehealth app putting AI into production, sure the EU AI Act doesn't apply to them. Scroll down to see what a two-minute audit actually finds — and what each finding means, without the legal jargon.

Me

Medra Health

Care, sooner. · Telemedicine app

We're a health app with a symptom checker and a booking bot. Medical rules we know — but AI rules too?
Kaan, founder
Conformly scan
2declared
5found
3 they didn't know about
  • Symptom TriageSuggests urgency and next steps
    declared
  • Booking botHelps patients book appointments
    declared
  • npm:@vitals-ai/distressDetects patient distress from voice and face
    undeclared
  • openai:gpt-4oGenerates patient-education explainer videos
    undeclared
  • No-Show PredictorFlags likely missed appointments
    undeclared

The founder named 2. A read-only scan of the code found 5. Here is what each one means — in plain words.

Finding 1 of 5 High-risk — real duties

Symptom Triage & Distress Detection

Suggests how urgent a symptom is and reads patient distress from voice and face to prioritise care.

Software that helps decide how urgent someone's medical care is behaves like part of a medical device — so it's high-risk. And here's the twist: reading distress from a face would be banned in hiring, but it's allowed here because it's for medical reasons. Allowed — but with the full high-risk rulebook.

In plain words: A symptom-checker that steers care is treated like medical equipment: it has to be safe, tested, and supervised.

What the law says

Annex IAI that is a safety component of a medical device is high-risk under Annex I (the product-safety route), applying from 2 August 2028. Article 5(1)(f)'s emotion-recognition ban carves out medical purposes, so clinical distress detection is permitted — but still high-risk.

Deadline: 2 August 2028
If ignored: Up to €15M or 3% of global turnover.
The fix

Confirm the medical-device classification, then run the high-risk checklist and the conformity-assessment route.

How Conformly helps

Conformly maps it to the Annex I high-risk track, generates the technical documentation, and shows the 2028 timeline against your plan.

An inspector would open with: "Provide the medical-device conformity assessment and the clinical validation for the triage model."

Finding 2 of 5 Just be transparent

Booking Bot

Chats with patients to help them book appointments.

Tell patients it's an AI. One clear line does it.

In plain words: A booking bot is fine — as long as it says it's a bot.

What the law says

Art. 50Article 50(1) requires people interacting with an AI system to be told so. Applies from 2 August 2026.

Deadline: 2 August 2026
If ignored: Up to €15M or 3% of global turnover.
The fix

Add "You're chatting with Medra's AI assistant" to the chat.

How Conformly helps

Conformly hosts the transparency page and the disclosure chip for you.

Finding 3 of 5 Just be transparent

AI Explainer Videos

Generates patient-education videos that explain conditions and treatments.

AI-generated health videos must carry a machine-readable 'AI-made' mark.

In plain words: If a computer made the health explainer, it needs an invisible 'AI-generated' tag.

What the law says

Art. 50(2)Article 50(2) requires machine-readable marking of synthetic media, transition to 2 December 2026 for existing systems.

Deadline: 2 December 2026
If ignored: Up to €15M or 3% of global turnover.
The fix

Add provenance metadata (C2PA) to generated videos.

How Conformly helps

The obligation lands on your task list; the watermark checker confirms whether the video already carries provenance metadata.

Finding 4 of 5 You're fine

No-Show Predictor

Flags appointments likely to be missed, for internal scheduling.

Nothing to do. It helps you plan rota; it doesn't make a decision about the patient's care. Minimal risk.

In plain words: Guessing who might miss an appointment just helps you plan. It's fine.

What the law says

Not high-risk and outside Article 50 — minimal-risk only.

The fix

No action required. Keep it listed.

How Conformly helps

Conformly records it in your inventory so the picture is complete.

Finding 5 of 5 You're fine

Smart Scheduler

Optimises appointment slots across clinicians.

Nothing owed. It's an efficiency tool that doesn't affect anyone's rights. Minimal risk.

In plain words: Auto-arranging the calendar is just admin. It's fine.

What the law says

Not high-risk and outside Article 50 — minimal-risk only.

The fix

No action required.

How Conformly helps

Kept in your inventory so nothing is undocumented.

The verdict

Medra assumed AI rules were for big labs. The audit put their triage tool on the medical-device high-risk track (with a 2028 deadline), explained why their distress detection is allowed where a recruiter's wouldn't be, and left two quick disclosure fixes.

0
must stop now
1
high-risk file
2
transparency fix
2
already fine

That startup was made up. Your AI isn't.

The same deterministic engine can classify your real systems in two minutes — no sign-up, no sales call. Or drop the read-only scanner into your codebase and see what it finds.

npx conformly-scan --dry-run

An example audit — a realistic walkthrough of how Conformly's deterministic engine classifies this kind of AI product. Not legal advice.